Home
» Information » Is evolutionary informatics a deathstar for Darwinism?
Is evolutionary informatics a deathstar for Darwinism?
| June 13, 2017 | Posted by News under Information |
What difference does evidence make, as opposed to piety, political correctness, or court judgments? Find out here:
- Bob’s interview with Julian Charles’s on “The Mind Renewed” about “Introduction to Evolutionary Informatics”- Youtube: https://youtu.be/y3f-h08PGak , Podcast: http://
themindrenewed.com/mp3/TMR_ 173_DrRobertJMarksII_ Evolutionary_Informatics_ 128kbps.mp3 - Bob’s essay at EN “Top Ten Questions and Objections to Introduction to Evolutionary Informatics'” https://
evolutionnews.org/2017/06/top- ten-questions-and-objections- to-introduction-to- evolutionary-informatics/ - Winston’s “ID the Future” podcast #1 on “Introduction to Evolutionary Informatics” titled “Author of New Book Tells Why Evolution Simulations … Don’t” http://www.discovery.
org/multimedia/audio/2017/05/ author-of-new-book-tells-why- evolution-simulations-dont/ - Winston’s “ID the Future” podcast #2 on “Introduction to Evolutionary Informatics” titled “Why Digital Cambrian Explosions Fizzle … Or Fake It” … http://www.discovery.org/
multimedia/audio/2017/06/why- digital-cambrian-explosions- fizzle-or-fake-it/ - Granville’s EN “Intelligent Design Goes International — A Report from Istanbul” https://
evolutionnews.org/2017/05/ intelligent-design-goes- international-a-report-from- istanbul/ - Bob’s essay in CNS News “Sorry Darwin: New Video Game Proves Adaptation Is Ubiquitous – Not Evolution” http://www.cnsnews.
com/commentary/robert-j-marks- ii/sorry-darwin-video-game- proves-adaptation-ubiquitous- not-evolution - Bob’s editorial in the Dallas Morning News: http://robertmarks.org/
InTheNews/2017Media/170417% 20Texas%20should%20let%20kids% 20explore%20whether%20Darwin% 20got%20it%20right%20_% 20Commentary%20_%20Dallas% 20News.htm - Bob’s interview on the Bob Phillips Show in Austin: Youtube: https://youtu.be/dmNOrtWPVzs
(Visited 444 times, 444 visits today)
17 Responses to Is evolutionary informatics a deathstar for Darwinism?
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
The Deathstar was a huge expensive project that the proponents, in their hubris, thought would be the ultimate weapon against their foes. It was utterly destroyed by a small band of sufficiently committed people. So the answer to the question in the title might well be “yes”.
Bob O’H: If you have read the book, would you like to expand on your sneer? What huge expensive project? What sufficiently committed people?
I guess you haven’t seen any of the Star Wars films. Feel free to draw an analogy between the Death Star and Evolutionary Informatics, but don’t be surprised if you find out it’s a trap.
Better analogy, evolutionary informatics is the blueprint for the exhaust port on the Darwin Deathstar. The Darwin Deathstar has been used to kill and enslave hundreds of millions people already, and the rebels need to destroy it post haste. Conservation of information is evolution’s Achilles heel.
EricMH – whilst I’d disagree about the suggestion that Darwinism is a great evil, I agree that that would work better to get over the point Denyse was trying to make.
Perhaps coming up with analogies is Denyse’s exhaust port.
Darwinism has been used to justify great evils in logically valid ways. So, Darwinism has certainly been instrumental in great evils. If it is false, as ID has certainly done well in demonstrating, then Darwinism is evil in motivation as well. Why make up and perpetuate a falsehood that is used to justify untold anguish except for malevolence?
Of course, you do not agree that Darwinism is false or a lie, but surely you must understand what is at stake, and why ID proponents are not merely trying to make ourselves feel good or whatever other agenda you ascribe to us. We don’t merely believe that Darwinism is false, but that it is dangerously false. This obliviousness, like the atheists who claim religion is the source of all evil despite the USSR, modern China, and a variety of other atheistic genocidal regimes, makes someone like me believe you are being disingenuous and prompted me to take ID arguments seriously.
Bob O’H at 3, having to deal with real science all the time, I do not have the time to research Star Wars. I do know a bad idea when I see one.
Bob O’H:
This is really what evolutionists should be all about: working to analytically understand and falsify the processes they allegedly study. One side labors and the other profits. The hubris lies on the side that scoffs at rigor.
@Denyse:
At least you admit that you don’t know what you are talking about.
Orloog, watch out. I have read the book. Have you?
Has Bob O’H read the book? As opposed to making crude remarks like “Perhaps coming up with analogies is Denyse’s exhaust port.”
Oh wait, maybe Orloog is dispensed from reading books. Too hard on the head?
“maybe Orloog is dispensed from reading books”
Someone needs to read a grammar book.
And I don’t know why Bob’s remark is crude. Although you haven’t seen Star Wars (!?), you should be able to pick up from the context that “exhaust port” is being uses as an analogy for “weak point”
News — just let the Stars Wars fans among us indulge ourselves with some harmless geekiness.
Bob O’H may or may not have the death sentence on 12 systems, but in this case, he’s not sneering or being crude — just being nerdy.
Deathstar, exhaust port, “it’s a trap”, death sentence on 12 systems — all Stars Wars references.
News @ 11 – I don’t understand, what book am I meant to have read? The “exhaust port” comment was not meant to be crude – my apologies if it came across that way. As cmow & Pindi have pointed out, it was Star Wars nerdiness.
(I’m also tempted to point out, in answer to your comment at 7 that the title of this post falsifies your final comment, as demonstrated by the comments in this thread)
Yes, Darwinism is the Death Star. Or the Borg Cube “Resistance is futile”. Maybe a Vogon Ship “Resistance is useless”.